ffvfw vs. divx3 vs. xvid

///M3 2 NV · Messages: 546 Registration: 02.22.2002

for my friends on "hr.rec.divx" and obviously for anyone interested.... [edit:time's up] { divx_vs_ffvfw[& a bit of xvid].rar [3,28MB] } edit:added missing xvid screenshots to web-space_ { xvid[frames08,20,61,84].rar [1,09MB ] } note:xvid's ME got really out of shape on the scene after cca. frame50 ( when camera in guys hand is moved downwards...) : both divx3 and ffvfw were ok on that scene if there's interest i'll post short video sample of that anomaly ( let me just add that i've seen ME problems on xvid before ( simillar to divx4.12 problems for same video-source )....it's was moto-racing video....needless to say divx3 got that ok... ) [ on the subject of png or bmp's ,post on "hr.misc.binaries" for you koke....... ]

2001vdubbgolf · Messages: 107 Registration: 02.25.2002

What's ffvfw???

m3cowboy · Messages: 279 Registration: 01.06.2003

Nandub kicks Vidomi's ass in terms of encoding for quality and size. Only a newbie would use Vidomi IMO ;)

Vegadark · Messages: 80 Registration: 08.05.2002

>P.P.S. Ehm, I know it`s not polite, but your nick is not very practical. copy->paste: ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ ^^-+I4004+-^^ see..........

jmciver · Messages: 2,778 Registration: 06.22.2001

Only two ways to get perfect quality with DivX3.11a and thats Fairuse and Nandub :p And any newbie can use Virtualdub and DivX5.02 Pro or XviD now and have damn near perfect quality :cool: If your to compare DivX3.11a to anything besure to use the best possible way. ;)