v5.34pre7 - February 15 2017

bimmerbob · Messages: 3 Registration: 12.03.2002

Proposal: propagate

Robcast · Messages: 573 Registration: 02.26.2001

Let's say we have this situation here where both automation items are pooled: And then we add another automation item in one portion of the first to do some LFO work (LFO1): If we glue both automation items (first Take1 and the LFO1) this is the result: I understand it's a brand new automation item but REAPER should warn about losing the pooling. In an ideal world, and this is my request, it would be very nice if REAPER could propagate this change to all pooled items.

Carzzi · Messages: 745 Registration: 04.18.2002

It would also be nice to have "ramp up" and "ramp down" shapes for the LFO. Just thinking out loud...

carrrnuttt · Messages: 419 Registration: 12.08.2003

when tracks are minimized to full small-ness, any non-hidden but active envelopes disappear. i'd love just some tint, or even a single pixel that would indicate presence. most of my tracks are in a state of perpetual shrunken-ness, but they still have a lot of envelope stuff going on, and the visual queueueue would be quite helpful. it might be my imagination, but i think that if there's only 1 active envelope, it doesn't disappear when tracks are minimized to smallest vertical. if there are multiple, they do. i think there should be at least a hint of presence because that indication is very useful.

HK_M3 · Messages: 2,225 Registration: 07.27.2001

AI BUGS

Tommy R · Messages: 67 Registration: 06.03.2003

Devs, Found some more AI bugs: In this one notice what happens to the first segment when I move a point, no matter which point I move that first segment goes from curved to straight. In this one watch what happens at the end of the AI when I move the first segment. In this one watch what happens as I increase the length by one grid division then drag the first segment, segment 2 now turns into a straight one. I then increase the length by 2 more divisions and segment 4 goes straight. In this final one when gluing a parametric AI with the bottom one(this one is not an LFO triangle, it's just one I drew by hand) the result is not what is expected. When using a low freq. for the parametric AI the result still looks like a sine wave, however the higher the freq. the more distorted it becomes. At around a freq. of 45 you get what looks loke a triangle wave. In this cap I just showed the end result at freq. 45

Alibabajun · Messages: 391 Registration: 08.19.2001

Is there any word on implementing automation items for tempo and time signature on the master track?

dhabes · Messages: 88 Registration: 06.25.2001

Bug: AIs with LFO shapes are not working well unless tempo is 120bpm. I thought maybe it was because I didn't have any tempo marker inserted in the project and I only changed bpm to 135. But I tried inserting some tempo markers to 135 and it is still happening. So, what is happening? You save a perfect automation item, looped, with a LFO shape, and next time you reopen the project, they are out of sync with the tempo. And if you go to properties of the AI again and select the LFO shape again, it is updated to the correct tempo. But then saving the project and reopening it again and the same issue happens.